ABSTRACT
China is widely recognized for its achievements in reducing absolute
poverty since the adoption of a broad program of rural economic reforms
beginning in 1978. Based on the government's austere rural poverty line,
official estimates indicate that poverty declined from more than 30
percent of the rural population in 1978 to less than 5 percent by end-1998.
"The Chinese government has a strong commitment to poverty reduction,
and the scale and funding of its poverty reduction program, and the
sustained dramatic reduction of absolute poverty over the last twenty
years of reform, are exemplary by any standards.
Estimates based on an international poverty line document an equally
steep decline in the incidence of poverty in China. However, since the
international standard is somewhat less severe than China's official
poverty line, it indicates greater numbers of poor in all years, and
that by end-1998 a much larger share of the rural population@about 11.5
percent or some 106 million people@remained in poverty. While China's
austere poverty line was a useful standard when the incidence of extreme
poverty was greater, the international standard has now become a more
appropriate measure to gauge the extent of poverty and guide the government's
poverty reduction program in the next century. Available evidence also
shows that an increasing share of the remaining rural poor are now concentrated
in China's western provinces, and mostly within remote and mountainous
townships. The educational, health, and nutritional status of these
remaining rural poor is deplorable, and minority peoples and the disabled
are known to represent highly disproportionate shares of the rural poor.
Assisting these remaining poor requires the continuance of the existing
poverty reduction system. The key issue is not allocating more funding
for poverty reduction, but is instead making more efficient and effective
use of available funding. This can be achieved through a number of measures.
First, available poverty reduction funding should be targeted to all
poor townships. The current system of targeting the nationally-designated
592 poor counties results in the provision of very little assistance
for the half of the poor residing outside the designated poor counties,
and to a very substantial leakage of assistance to the non-poor within
the poor counties. Second, financial monitoring and supervision of the
use of poverty reduction funds must be greatly strengthened. At present,
the weak fiscal situation in China's poor areas motivates local governments
to divert a large share of poverty reduction funding to alternative
uses, and the very limited supervision of the use of available funding
often leads to poor quality of poverty reduction works and activities.
A number of government agencies provide funding and other support for
poverty reduction, and the overall coordination and accountability of
this array of assistance is inadequate. Third, the effectiveness of
funding to increase the productivity of upland agriculture (where the
majority of China's poor attempt to eke out subsistence levels of production)
could be greatly enhanced through (a) adopting a multi-year "project-based"
approach with greater community participation in design and implementation,
(b) developing appropriate applied agricultural technologies, and (c)
completing realistic assessments of the market prospects for a wide
array of niche crops which are now being planted extensively in China's
upland areas. Fourth, greater efforts must be made to provide the poor
with improved access to basic education, health, credit, water supply,
and roads and other basic infrastructure. Fifth, past attempts to foster
enterprise development in the poor areas through direct funding have
had mixed results. Local government should instead focus on providing
an enabling environmentfor rural enterprise development. Finally, China's
poverty reduction work could be enhanced by forging stronger links with
other government, academic and civic organizations. The next generation
of poverty work could include contracting the implementation of some
small projects to grass roots and civic organizations, which might enable
the poverty program to try new and
innovative approaches, and improve its outreach.