EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A. THE REMAINING CHALLENGE
¡¡¡¡Twenty Years of Poverty Rediiction. China is widely recognized for
its achievements in reducing absolute poverty since the adoption of
a broad program of rural economic reforms beginning in 1978. Broad participation
in the subsequent reform-driven economic growth, together with a well-funded
national poverty reduction program, have brought about a tremendous
reduction in rural absolute poverty during the past twenty years. Official
estimates indicate that rural poverty declined from roughly 260 million
poor in 1978 to 42 million in 1998, or from one-third to about one-twentieth
of total rural population. These official estimates are based on the
government's austere poverty line equivalent to $0.66 per day (in constant
1985 purchasing power parity dollars).

¡¡¡¡The World Bank has developed an international poverty standard of
SI .00 per day (in 1985 purchasing power parity dollars) for cross-country
comparisons of poverty. Estimates based on this somewhat less severe
poverty line indicate substantially¡¡greater numbers of absolute poor
in China in all years, but do confirm the¡¡continuing remarkable decline
in poverty during the 1990s. As shown in Figure I, the international
standard indicates that by end-1998 a much larger share of the rural
population about 11.5 percent or some 106 million people@remained in
poverty.
¡¡¡¡The government's austere poverty line was a useful standard when the
incidence of¡¡extreme poverty was greater, and helped to target available
poverty reduction funding to those¡¡most in need. However, the government's
poverty line may no longer be such an effective tool in¡¡identifying
the potential beneficiaries of national poverty reduction efforts since
such a small¡¡share of the population now have income levels below it,
and large numbers of transient poor¡¡have income levels just slightly
greater than it. In addition, those with incomes consistently below¡¡the
poverty line suffer extreme hardship and deprivation. Consequently,
China should consider¡¡whether the international standard may now be
a more appropriate measure to gauge the extent¡¡of poverty and guide
its poverty reduction program.
¡¡¡¡The Chinese government has a strong commitment to poverty reduction,
and most
government ministries and agencies have special poverty reduction responsibilities
and projects.¡¡The State Council's Leading Group for Poverty Reduction
(LGPR) was established in 1986 in¡¡part to provide greater coherence
to these many poverty reduction initiatives and, in particular, to¡¡expedite
economic development in the poor areas. LGPR has emerged as the principal
advocate¡¡of China's rural poor, and is now the key agency responsible
for coordinating the nation's more¡¡than US$2 billion in annual funding
for poverty reduction programs. This funding is organized
under China's "8-7 Poverty Reduction Plan" (8-7 Plan), which
was established by LGPR in 1994¡¡to overcome remaining absolute poverty
in the nationally-designated 592 poor counties. The scale¡¡and funding
of China's 8-7 Plan poverty reduction program, and the sustained dramatic
reduction¡¡of absolute poverty over the last twenty years of reform,
are exemplary by the standards of any¡¡developing country.
¡¡¡¡Current Challenge. Even with the successes to date, there are still
more than 100 million¡¡rural absolute poor, and in most cases this remaining
poverty is both severe and relatively¡¡intractable. In the past, the
broad incidence of poverty made it possible to achieve substantial¡¡reductions
in poverty through general economic growth and through programs that
were more¡¡broadly targeted. At present, the majority of the rural poor
are concentrated in resource deficient¡¡areas, and comprise entire communities
located mostly in upland sections of the interior
provinces of northern, northwestern and southwestern China. Although
these poor have land use¡¡rights, in most cases the land itself is of
such low quality that it is not possible to achieve¡¡subsistence levels
of crop production. Consequently, in most years the poorest of the poor¡¡consume
grain and other subsistence foods beyond their own production levels.
The poorest¡¡households are typically those further disadvantaged by
high dependency ratios, ill health and¡¡other ¡¡difficulties. Minority
peoples and peoples with disabilities are known to represent a highly¡¡disproportionate
share of the rural poor. Poverty also exacerbates society-wide problems
of lower¡¡rates of female participation in education, higher relative
female infant mortality rates, and higher¡¡rates of maternal mortality.
Available evidence suggests that the severity of the remaining poverty¡¡worsened
somewhat during much of the 1990s. As shown in Table I below, the squared
poverty
gap index increased during the 1990s, and in 1998 remained considerably
greater than in 1990.
¡¡¡¡The educational, health and nutritional status of these remaining
absolute poor is¡¡deplorable. As many as half of the boys in many of
China's poorest villages and, particularly in¡¡some minority areas, nearly
all of the girls do not attend school and will not achieve literacy.¡¡Infant
mortality rates and maternal mortality ratios in very poor counties
exceed 10 percent and¡¡0.3 percent respectively (or at least 50 percent
to 100 percent greater than the national average),¡¡and are greater yet
in the poorest townships and villages. Incidence of several infectious
and¡¡endemic diseases, including tuberculosis and iodine deficiency disorders,
is concentrated in poor¡¡and remote areas. Roughly half of children in
households at or below the absolute poverty line are¡¡at least mildly
malnourished (stunted), and iron, vitamin A, and other micronutrient
deficiencies
remain a severe problem among the poor. As many as 90 percent of poor
children suffer chronic¡¡worm infections.
\a The official government poverty Sine is the equivalent
of $0.66 per day.
Note: Both sets of estimates are derived from per capita income data
from the State Statistical Bureau's annual sample survey of rural households.
Source: Author's calculations.
¡¡¡¡Regional Concentration of the Poor. The reduction in
rural poverty has been greatest ir¡¡China's coastal and central regions
where rural economic growth has been greatest. Many ofth¡¡rural poor
in 1978 resided in less remote and less hilly areas in the coastal and
central regions, when¡¡increased application of fertilizer, irrigation,
better seed and other modern inputs could bring abou
rapid productivity gains, and so were better able to participate in
the rapid agricultural growth ofth¡¡reform period. Most of the residual
poor have remained trapped in more remote upland areas when¡¡agricultural
productivity gains have proven far more problematic. Available evidence
shows thai¡¡this trend has continued in the 1990s, with an increasing
share of the rural poor now concentrate(
in China's western provinces. The number of poor in the western provinces
(including both th¡¡northwestern and southwestern provinces) increased
from less than half of all of China's rura¡¡poor at the beginning of
the 1990s to more than two thirds (about 70 percent) by 1996. Thii¡¡increasing
concentration of poverty in the western provinces is observed using
both the officia¡¡government poverty line and the international dollar
per day poverty line. The change in thi¡¡distribution of remaining rural
poverty was driven by sharp declines in the incidence of poverty ii¡¡the
eastern and central provinces relative to the more modest achievements
in the westen¡¡provinces. Poverty reduction in the northwestern provinces
appears to have been particularly¡¡limited, and the severity of poverty
is also deepest in these provinces.
¡¡¡¡Mountain Area Poverty. In addition to this concentration of poverty
in the westen¡¡provinces, it is believed that the majority of China's
poor reside in mountainous counties an¡¡townships. A number of observers
have concluded that China's poverty problem mainly occurs ii¡¡poor mountain
regions, and China's poverty reduction programs have long focused on
mountair¡¡areas. Available information and field visits in a number of
poor areas have documente¡¡considerable disparity at the county level,
and confirm that a very high proportion of the rura
poor live in mountain townships. These poor mountain townships are located
in the nationally¡¡designated and provincially-designated poor counties,
and in a number of other counties no¡¡specifically designated as poor.
Administrative boundaries in mountain counties typical);¡¡delineate better-off
townships around the county seat and in wide valley floors @baqu"),
an¡¡poorer mountain townships in higher elevation outlying areas ("shanqu").
In Yunnan, foiexample, the provincial government selected 506 key townships
for poverty reduction program'beginning in 1995. Almost all of these
poor townships are distributed in high mountain ranges, in¡¡steeply-sloped
mountains, and in minority and border areas. Some 86 percent of Yunnan's¡¡remaining
poor in 1996 reportedly resided in these 506 poor townships.
1¡¢¡¡¡¡The significance of the difference between the official government
estimates of poverty and those based on the¡¡international standard
is discussed in The World Bank (1996). As shown in Annex I, the sharp
decline in rural¡¡poverty during the 1990s is observed across a variety
of poverty lines ranging between S0.5 to $2.5 per day.
2¡¢¡¡¡¡Available evidence indicates an increase in urban poverty during
the 1990s. However, at present, less than one¡¡percent of the registered
urban population have income levels less than the dollar per day international
poverty¡¡line. ¡¡Consequently, in 1998, the 106 million rural poor greatly
exceeded the less than 3 million registered urban¡¡poor.
3¡¢¡¡¡¡The squared poverty gap index is a measure of the income that
would be necessary to bring a poor person up to the¡¡poverty line.
A greater index value indicates greater severity of poverty.
£Ûnext£Ý